<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for web{er}log</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Traditional Family&#8221; by A.M.P</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/traditional-family/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>A.M.P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/traditional-family/#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>According to this essay, I do not live in a traditional family at all.  Who says that a traditional family consists of a mother and a father with two children who are both under the age of eighteen years of age? What is a traditional family anyway?  I hardly know anyone who has a &#039;traditional family&#039; at this point.  I live in a single parent household with TWO younger siblings so I do not fall into the category of having a traditional family. 

The census bureau makes no sense in creating a definition of a &quot;traditional family.&quot;  The United States is inhabited by many different people who come from all parts of the world.  There is no way that everyone will have a traditional family and there is no reason for anyone to feel badly about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this essay, I do not live in a traditional family at all.  Who says that a traditional family consists of a mother and a father with two children who are both under the age of eighteen years of age? What is a traditional family anyway?  I hardly know anyone who has a &#8216;traditional family&#8217; at this point.  I live in a single parent household with TWO younger siblings so I do not fall into the category of having a traditional family. </p>
<p>The census bureau makes no sense in creating a definition of a &#8220;traditional family.&#8221;  The United States is inhabited by many different people who come from all parts of the world.  There is no way that everyone will have a traditional family and there is no reason for anyone to feel badly about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Word Police&#8221; by A.M.P</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/word-police/#comment-2453</link>
		<dc:creator>A.M.P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/word-police/#comment-2453</guid>
		<description>I found this essay interesting because I never took the time out of my day to actually think about the language I use and verify whether or not is was politically correct.  I&#039;m certain that I have come across people that have been offended by the language that I&#039;ve used around them and just never said anything about it.  I truly believe that if people get offended by a word than they are giving the word power by all means.  If you don&#039;t believe that a word describe who you are, then there is no reason to become offended by its use no matter whether it&#039;s politically correct or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this essay interesting because I never took the time out of my day to actually think about the language I use and verify whether or not is was politically correct.  I&#8217;m certain that I have come across people that have been offended by the language that I&#8217;ve used around them and just never said anything about it.  I truly believe that if people get offended by a word than they are giving the word power by all means.  If you don&#8217;t believe that a word describe who you are, then there is no reason to become offended by its use no matter whether it&#8217;s politically correct or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Word Police&#8221; by I.R.H.</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/word-police/#comment-2452</link>
		<dc:creator>I.R.H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/word-police/#comment-2452</guid>
		<description>The short essay, The World Police, by Michiko Kakutani address’s political correction. However, using words like black and gay instead of African American and homosexual should not be at the head of everyone’s personal agenda. Being extremely cautious so that no one is offended is extremely ridiculous. Words or just words unless they’re given power by those who are offended by it. I’m black and so what. I wouldn’t care if someone else calls me black instead of African American, because I don’t let the stupidity of political correction get to me. An abundant amount of the politically correct words are so reformed and sensitive, that they become senseless. The blame should be put on the English language, not the people who use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short essay, The World Police, by Michiko Kakutani address’s political correction. However, using words like black and gay instead of African American and homosexual should not be at the head of everyone’s personal agenda. Being extremely cautious so that no one is offended is extremely ridiculous. Words or just words unless they’re given power by those who are offended by it. I’m black and so what. I wouldn’t care if someone else calls me black instead of African American, because I don’t let the stupidity of political correction get to me. An abundant amount of the politically correct words are so reformed and sensitive, that they become senseless. The blame should be put on the English language, not the people who use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Mess&#8221; by I.R.H.</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/mess/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>I.R.H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/mess/#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>“Mess is a state of mind. Or rather, messiness is a particular relation between the state of arrangement of a collection of things and a state of mind that contemplates it in its containing space” (462). 

	Messiness is evidently based on individual perception. A mess is defined as a state of embarrassing confusion; however, it is also defined as a person or thing that is dirty or untidy. If a person believes, for example, their room isn’t messy because everything is organized or they know the position of everything, then to them, their room isn’t messy. However, someone else may perceive the room to be messy because they’re unfamiliar with the where about of things and in addition, it isn’t their personal space. Messy does indeed have a universal definition but a mess is a state of mind. Mess is based on personal acuity and one’s ability to feel comfortable in a certain place. If I’m comfortable with having papers all over the bed and clothes on the floor, then my room isn’t a mess; however, to me it’s perfect and fine the way it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Mess is a state of mind. Or rather, messiness is a particular relation between the state of arrangement of a collection of things and a state of mind that contemplates it in its containing space” (462). </p>
<p>	Messiness is evidently based on individual perception. A mess is defined as a state of embarrassing confusion; however, it is also defined as a person or thing that is dirty or untidy. If a person believes, for example, their room isn’t messy because everything is organized or they know the position of everything, then to them, their room isn’t messy. However, someone else may perceive the room to be messy because they’re unfamiliar with the where about of things and in addition, it isn’t their personal space. Messy does indeed have a universal definition but a mess is a state of mind. Mess is based on personal acuity and one’s ability to feel comfortable in a certain place. If I’m comfortable with having papers all over the bed and clothes on the floor, then my room isn’t a mess; however, to me it’s perfect and fine the way it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Traditional Family&#8221; by I.R.H.</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/traditional-family/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>I.R.H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/traditional-family/#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>“I just found out that our family is no longer what the Census Bureau calls a traditional American family, and I want everyone to know that this is not our fault” (576).

	What does the Census Bureau define a tradition American family as? America is an enormous melting pot, residence to ethnicities and races from all corners of the Earth. The United States is an escape to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, distinct from other countries totalitarian, controlling and propaganda rid governments. Thus, with the influx of different cultures and interracial marriages, traditions are no longer traditional. The belief in a traditional American family does not exist. America is defined by the numerous amounts of immigrants that migrated to this country. There is no such thing as an American. Everyone one who lives in the United States can be traced to some foreign nation. The United States of America should be renamed to the United Nation. So when someone asks you what the traditional American family is like, your response should be, it varies because America is not a nation of Americans but immigrant; being American is only a title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I just found out that our family is no longer what the Census Bureau calls a traditional American family, and I want everyone to know that this is not our fault” (576).</p>
<p>	What does the Census Bureau define a tradition American family as? America is an enormous melting pot, residence to ethnicities and races from all corners of the Earth. The United States is an escape to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, distinct from other countries totalitarian, controlling and propaganda rid governments. Thus, with the influx of different cultures and interracial marriages, traditions are no longer traditional. The belief in a traditional American family does not exist. America is defined by the numerous amounts of immigrants that migrated to this country. There is no such thing as an American. Everyone one who lives in the United States can be traced to some foreign nation. The United States of America should be renamed to the United Nation. So when someone asks you what the traditional American family is like, your response should be, it varies because America is not a nation of Americans but immigrant; being American is only a title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Word Police&#8221; by TAW</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/word-police/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>TAW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/word-police/#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>“In the case of the politically correct, the prohibition of certain words, phrases and ideas is advanced in the cause of building a brave new world free of racism and hate, but this vision of harmony clashes with the very ideals of diversity and inclusion that the multi-cultural movement holds dear, and it&#039;s purchased at the cost of freedom of expression and freedom of speech.”

I like that people want to remove the sexism, racism and prejudices in our vocabulary because words are very powerful, but it’s being too overdone. Instead of picking at the tiny details of some of these words, people need to look at the bigger picture. Physical change is sometimes stronger than verbal change. If people physically see the changes in society than it will probably have a bigger impact. Changing the vocabulary has good intentions, but I don’t think it’s the most important thing right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“In the case of the politically correct, the prohibition of certain words, phrases and ideas is advanced in the cause of building a brave new world free of racism and hate, but this vision of harmony clashes with the very ideals of diversity and inclusion that the multi-cultural movement holds dear, and it&#8217;s purchased at the cost of freedom of expression and freedom of speech.”</p>
<p>I like that people want to remove the sexism, racism and prejudices in our vocabulary because words are very powerful, but it’s being too overdone. Instead of picking at the tiny details of some of these words, people need to look at the bigger picture. Physical change is sometimes stronger than verbal change. If people physically see the changes in society than it will probably have a bigger impact. Changing the vocabulary has good intentions, but I don’t think it’s the most important thing right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Mess&#8221; by TAW</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/mess/#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator>TAW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/mess/#comment-2448</guid>
		<description>“Messiness is a particular relation between the state of arrangement of a collection of things and a state of mind that contemplates it in its containing space.”

This essay is exactly how I picture a classification essay to be written. Hollander had a very good structure when he brought up the different points he made. He also included his own opinion about “mess” without turning it into a rant. I like how he defined “mess” as well. The way each person sees a “mess” depends on the way they perceive it. My room always looks somewhat clean to me, but my mom thinks its disgusting all of the time. I also liked how Hollander included the historical definition of “mess”. Its funny how “mess” was an amount of food and now its been turned into both a literal and mental definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Messiness is a particular relation between the state of arrangement of a collection of things and a state of mind that contemplates it in its containing space.”</p>
<p>This essay is exactly how I picture a classification essay to be written. Hollander had a very good structure when he brought up the different points he made. He also included his own opinion about “mess” without turning it into a rant. I like how he defined “mess” as well. The way each person sees a “mess” depends on the way they perceive it. My room always looks somewhat clean to me, but my mom thinks its disgusting all of the time. I also liked how Hollander included the historical definition of “mess”. Its funny how “mess” was an amount of food and now its been turned into both a literal and mental definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Traditional Family&#8221; by TAW</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/traditional-family/#comment-2447</link>
		<dc:creator>TAW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/traditional-family/#comment-2447</guid>
		<description>I thought that the concept of this essay was pretty good, but the structure of it annoyed me. I felt that Trillin could have expressed his views on the census of a traditional family a little better. But then again, it could have been written to sound like a rant. It starts off somewhat calm, but then he gets angry and starts pointing out all of the different reasons why his family is a traditional family. According to the census of a traditional family, my family falls under it. I’m the eldest and I have to 2 siblings and 2 parents. I don’t understand why Trillin is so connected to this census. Its not going to change the actions of his family and the census doesn’t have any major control in the lives of Americans so it shouldn’t affect him at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that the concept of this essay was pretty good, but the structure of it annoyed me. I felt that Trillin could have expressed his views on the census of a traditional family a little better. But then again, it could have been written to sound like a rant. It starts off somewhat calm, but then he gets angry and starts pointing out all of the different reasons why his family is a traditional family. According to the census of a traditional family, my family falls under it. I’m the eldest and I have to 2 siblings and 2 parents. I don’t understand why Trillin is so connected to this census. Its not going to change the actions of his family and the census doesn’t have any major control in the lives of Americans so it shouldn’t affect him at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Mess&#8221; by JJLS</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/mess/#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>JJLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/mess/#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>This essay was kind of confusing for me; I feel that I lost key points in the essay when I drifted off. I mean I don’t really have anything to say about an essay that I didn’t finish, once again I’m forced to forfeit, have nothing of substance to write about the essay. I barely was able to grasp the differences in the word, and I guess I can speak on that. I do agree that mess is a state of mind and each person’s idea of what a mess is or what is messy can be different. What I find mess can be considered an organize mess to another person. Even the idea of an organize mess can be challenged, who am I to say that your pile of work isn’t an organize mess, and or isn’t helpful for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This essay was kind of confusing for me; I feel that I lost key points in the essay when I drifted off. I mean I don’t really have anything to say about an essay that I didn’t finish, once again I’m forced to forfeit, have nothing of substance to write about the essay. I barely was able to grasp the differences in the word, and I guess I can speak on that. I do agree that mess is a state of mind and each person’s idea of what a mess is or what is messy can be different. What I find mess can be considered an organize mess to another person. Even the idea of an organize mess can be challenged, who am I to say that your pile of work isn’t an organize mess, and or isn’t helpful for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Mess&#8221; by BNP</title>
		<link>http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/mess/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>BNP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weberenglish.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/mess/#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>This was one of my least favorite essays. I feel as though the author wrote this essay basically creating an excuse for himself as to why he is messy. He uses the illustration of an Alpha person rearranging the book stacks of a Beta. The moral of that illustration was to depict how someone else&#039;s mess is someone else&#039;s order and vice versa. I disagree but agree slightly. Every person has their own way of maintaining order and veing organized. What someone may view as mess may actually be someone else&#039;s order. However, any sane person can define a mess when they see one. A mess is a mess; simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was one of my least favorite essays. I feel as though the author wrote this essay basically creating an excuse for himself as to why he is messy. He uses the illustration of an Alpha person rearranging the book stacks of a Beta. The moral of that illustration was to depict how someone else&#8217;s mess is someone else&#8217;s order and vice versa. I disagree but agree slightly. Every person has their own way of maintaining order and veing organized. What someone may view as mess may actually be someone else&#8217;s order. However, any sane person can define a mess when they see one. A mess is a mess; simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
